Branta Canadensis

Octopus
Octopus

I was Christmas shopping with Tom, my brother-in-law, a true manly man road builder with a big diesel pickup. I saw a dead goose by the side of the road. Tom was full of warnings about poaching, but made the two 3-point turns to come back around. I could not pass up the opportunity.

I thought I could make a photo to go with the very popular octopus photo.

Alexander Pope, The Wild Swan, 1900
Alexander Pope, The Wild Swan, 1900

I've also been fascinated with Alexander Pope. The De Young has a couple of his paintings, including The Wild Swan, which I love.

Two-thousand, ten is for composition. I spent last year intensely focussed on lighting, now I want to focus on composition, creating more complex images, and working with moods other than "this object is awesome" and concepts other than "this lighting is tricky". So, I tried to do as many different shots as I could.

The bird had a broken wing and a bunch of abrasions, so I figured it had been struck by a car, but with a newborn in the house, I needed to be extra careful. Luckily it was freezing outside, so I kept the the bird on the patio when I wasn't photographing it. Besides, I wasn't sure how quickly I'd be able to shoot (again, newborn).

Goose on Black
Goose on Black

My interest in animals continues, especially as symbols, and often dead, although I think that's only because they don't move. In looking for more information about Alexander Pope, I found I like a lot of old still-life, old French stuff and American trompe l'oeil, which, along with my affection for Norman Rockwell, is sure to get me kicked out of San Francisco.

Of course, a goose is not a swan, and a white door is not a black door.

After Alexander Pope
After Alexander Pope

My picture is more gruesome than Pope's, I think, which has to do with the asymmetry, and the uncomfortable way the wing points. This goose is some kind of undead avian doorman. Also, belly forward is far more vulnerable than spine forward, which is another way that Pope's is more flattering, more uplifting. Finally, the visible, bound legs connect the goose to the door and make it more real, whereas Pope's is realistic, but also sort of floats there like an angel.

Still-Life with Goose
Still-Life with Goose

I had to work with what I had around the house, prop-wise, since the goose had an expiration date and I was in the middle of the holidays with a newborn. The chinese mushrooms in the jar are not perfect, and the dagger's kind of weird. But I like the fall of the roses, and this picture holds together as a still-life. It's a scene, rather than a picture of a goose with some stuff around it.

In making this last photograph, I realized I have some interest in doing classical still-lifes of modern vocations. Jackie's a nurse, so I'll probably start there. Any volunteers?

I Hate Blogging

Right now anyway. I heard recently: "You can't think your way out of a writing block, but you can write your way out of a thinking block."*

And as usual, I find some thing that turns my creativity problem on it's head, and reminds me that however much my mind is convinced that it is in charge of creative endeavors, it is not.

I haven't been blocked photographically, for which I'm grateful. Just working on some projects that are taking a while. They're challenging and rewarding and when this particular promo is out, it will own.

So but this blog is supposed to be a kind of pastime, and yet as it's taken on a theme of sorts, I've found that theme at once kind of tiresome, and intimidating. At dinner, I said "I hate blogging.", and Jackie said "Write about that.", which is better than nothing.

And so, action, as always, the antidote to inertia. Which seems self-evident, right? Yet for the mind (my mind, at least), the action must be clearly, elegantly, cleverly, related to the particulars of the inertia. Yet in fact, any action at all will do. The body can free the mind.

Meanwhile, I'm still occasionally photographing wedding gifts. Thanks Rachel, for the blender. Jackie uses it all the time.

*I can't remember the source, and I've paraphrased it...

Flickr Surprise and Perhaps a New T-Shirt

Re my earlier post about how Flickr doesn't have an economy, apparently it does. According to The Searcher:

"Ever come across a photo with dozens if not hundreds of comments, and they all have these little blinky "Best of Sparkly Award" graphics in them? "Diamond in the Rough!". "Flaming Sword of Awesome!!" etc etc. Well the reason for that is many people are members of Flickr groups that enforce strict "commenting" rules. To post to the group, you have to first comment on some other photos in the group, or favorite them, or give them award blinkies. It's an artificial "game" of false attention, almost all geared towards one thing: getting their photos on Explore."

I had wondered why so many mediocre photos had so many hyperbolic (and blinking) adulations in the comments.

But really I made this post to increase exposure for this awesome image.